Rescheduling Collaborative Work

The first prerequisite for rescheduling any effort — the absolute must-have without which rescheduling is totally impossible — is a schedule. If you don't have a schedule you can't modify it. You're not in much better shape if your schedule is delusional, by which I mean that the schedule you do have is an over-optimistic fiction that nobody ever believed, or an out-of-date artifact the origin of which nobody still working here can remember. Rescheduling a delusional schedule is itself a delusion, because you didn't really have a schedule. But let's face it, when you're rescheduling a delusional schedule, you're probably just making another delusional schedule.

But I digress.

In any group of people engaged in collaboration, natural questions arise. For example, "When do you think you'll have X ready?" When someone asks a question like that, devising a schedule is probably going to happen. In some groups more formally managed, devising a schedule is one of the early tasks. If the group is large enough, or if the work is complicated enough, or if people outside the group are depending on the group to produce something real, the group will almost certainly need to devise a schedule. And just as certainly, in the fullness of time, they'll find it necessary to revise that schedule. So whenever you find yourself devising a schedule, set aside time in that schedule for revising the schedule. The one thing you can be certain of about any schedule is that you'll need to revise it.

To answer the need for expertise in rescheduling, this post and several to come explore the process of rescheduling. I'll address four fundamental questions about rescheduling:

• What is a schedule?
• What situations compel collaborative groups to reschedule their work?
• What patterns indicate effective rescheduling processes?
• What antipatterns indicate ineffective rescheduling processes?

In this post I address only the first question. I address the others in posts to come.

What a schedule is

Before undertaking to reschedule any effort, it's useful to know what we mean by schedule. In the context of executing an effort to produce a desired result, a schedule is a sequence of events or activities and their associated date specifications. Some definitions:

Event

An event is the production of an intended and observable result. An example of an observable result: "The Customer has witnessed a demonstration of our widget and has agreed that it does what the Customer wanted our widget to do."

Too often, Whenever you find yourself devising a schedule,
set aside time in that schedule to reschedule the
effort. The one thing you can be most certain of
about any schedule is that you'll need to revise it.schedules contain pseudo-events. A pseudo-event is a date or date range not associated with production of an intended, observable result. For example, "We have exerted 50% of the total effort that we estimated would be required by this work." While it might have been intended, consuming 50% of estimated effort is not an observable result.

The event date can be specified as either a specific date, or a range of dates from earliest acceptable to latest acceptable. If the event has a single date associated with it, it's usually permissible for the result to occur earlier. If the event has an associated date range, the two dates at the ends of the range are usually "earliest-acceptable" and either "latest acceptable" or "needed-by."

Activity

An activity is an intended, observable, ongoing action or set of actions that continues during the specified range of dates, until its exit criteria are met. An example of an activity: "The team meets with Customer to develop a complete set of acceptance criteria that relate to validating the Marigold installation." The exit criterion for such a task might be "Team and Customer agree."

Too often, schedules contain pseudo-activities. A pseudo-activity is similar to an activity but it lacks one or more of the attributes of an activity. It might lack dates, or exit criteria, or it might not be observable. For example, a pseudo-activity might be "In the first week of March, team members attend one week of training in writing user stories." Although this pseudo-activity has dates and although it is observable, it lacks exit criteria. We have no evidence that Team members learned anything.

The first step in rescheduling

A useful first step in rescheduling — often overlooked — is verifying that the existing schedule is actually a schedule. There are three basic criteria:

• All events are observable. They have dates or date ranges.
• All activities are observable. They have exit criteria and date ranges.
• Dates occur in transitive time order, even though they might be in the past. That is, if Event 3 is supposed to occur after Event 2, and Event 2 is supposed to occur after Event 1, then Event 3 is scheduled to occur after Event 1.

Last words

After checking the existing schedule to ensure that it meets the three criteria above, you're ready to set new dates for events and activities that aren't yet completed. I'll address that part of the process in posts to come.   Next issue in this series   Top    Next Issue

Projects never go quite as planned. We expect that, but we don't expect disaster. How can we get better at spotting disaster when there's still time to prevent it? How to Spot a Troubled Project Before the Trouble Starts is filled with tips for executives, senior managers, managers of project managers, and sponsors of projects in project-oriented organizations. It helps readers learn the subtle cues that indicate that a project is at risk for wreckage in time to do something about it. It's an ebook, but it's about 15% larger than "Who Moved My Cheese?" Just . Order Now! .

Your comments are welcome

About Point Lookout

Thank you for reading this article. I hope you enjoyed it and found it useful, and that you'll consider recommending it to a friend.

This article in its entirety was written by a human being. No machine intelligence was involved in any way.

Point Lookout is a free weekly email newsletter. Browse the archive of past issues. Subscribe for free.

Support Point Lookout by joining the Friends of Point Lookout, as an individual or as an organization.

Do you face a complex interpersonal situation? Send it in, anonymously if you like, and I'll give you my two cents.

Related articles

More articles on Project Management:

The Power and Hazards of Anecdotes: II

Anecdotes are powerful tools of persuasion, but with that power comes a risk that we might become persuaded of false positions. Here is Part II of a set of examples illustrating some hazards of anecdotes.

Wishful Thinking and Perception: II

Continuing our exploration of causes of wishful thinking and what we can do about it, here's Part II of a little catalog of ways our preferences and wishes affect our perceptions.

Seven More Planning Pitfalls: III

Planning teams, like all teams, are vulnerable to several patterns of interaction that can lead to counter-productive results. Two of these relevant to planners are a cognitive bias called the IKEA Effect, and a systemic bias against realistic estimates of cost and schedule.

Resolving Ambiguity

Ambiguity is anathema to success in collaborations. It causes errors and rework, extending time-to-market. When we interpret information, we often choose the first interpretation we find, never recognizing that others are possible. That leads to failure.

Should I Write or Should I Call?

After we recognize the need to contact a colleague or colleagues to work out a way to move forward, we next must decide how to make contact. Phone? Videoconference? Text message? There are some simple criteria that can help with such decisions.

See also Project Management and Project Management for more related articles.

Forthcoming issues of Point Lookout

Coming February 26: Devious Political Tactics: Bad Decisions

When workplace politics influences the exchanges that lead to important organizational decisions, we sometimes make decisions for reasons other than the best interests of the organization. Recognizing these tactics can limit the risk of bad decisions. Available here and by RSS on February 26.

And on March 5: On Begging the Question

Some of our most expensive wrong decisions have come about because we've tricked ourselves as we debated our options. The tricks sometimes arise from rhetorical fallacies that tangle our thinking. One of the trickiest is called Begging the Question. Available here and by RSS on March 5.

Coaching services

I offer email and telephone coaching at both corporate and individual rates. Contact Rick for details at rbrenjTnUayrCbSnnEcYfner@ChacdcYpBKAaMJgMalFXoCanyon.com or (650) 787-6475, or toll-free in the continental US at (866) 378-5470.

Get the ebook!

Past issues of Point Lookout are available in six ebooks:

• Get 2001-2 in Geese Don't Land on Twigs (PDF, )
• Get 2003-4 in Why Dogs Wag (PDF, )
• Get 2005-6 in Loopy Things We Do (PDF, )
• Get 2007-8 in Things We Believe That Maybe Aren't So True (PDF, )
• Get 2009-10 in The Questions Not Asked (PDF, )
• Get all of the first twelve years (2001-2012) in The Collected Issues of Point Lookout (PDF, )

Are you a writer, editor or publisher on deadline? Are you looking for an article that will get people talking and get compliments flying your way? You can have 500-1000 words in your inbox in one hour. License any article from this Web site. More info